Evaluating Tillage Practices and Herbicide Applications for Improved Rice Yield and Weed Control

Authors

  • Adnan Zahid Department of the Agronomy, University of the Punjab Lahore
  • Mr Aamir University of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Dr Sajid Ali University of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Dr M. Bilal Chattha University of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Dr Ammara Fatima Lahore college for women University
  • Mr Ahmad Raza University of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Mr. Nauman Shafqat University of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Miss Asma Ayub Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55627/pbulletin.003.02.01008

Keywords:

Weed control methods, Rice yield, Pre-emergence herbicides, Post-emergence herbicides, Grain Yield, Puddling

Abstract

Weed infestation, water scarcity and intensive tillage practices are resulting in low yield of rice crop. Direct seeded rice (DSR) and alternate wetting and drying (AWD) have emerged as alternative and resource efficient rice production methods. A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of weed control methods on weed management in rice under different tillage practices at research field of Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore during rice growing season in 2022. The experiment was carried out in two factorials randomized completely block design (RCBD) with three replications. First factor had four tillage practices [Puddling; Alternate wetting and drying; Direct seeded rice (Drill sowing) and direct seeded rice (Broadcast sowing)] and second factor had four weed control treatments [Control; Pre-emergence weed control (Pendimethalin 33 % EC @ 1000 g a.i. ha-1; Post-emergence weed control (Bispyribac sodium (18 % w/w) + Bensulfuron methyl (12 % w/w) @0.15 a.i. Kg ha-1 and combination of pre+ post emergence weed control]. In the experiment, 12 weed species from 7 families were observed as part of the weed flora. Among them 6 were grasses, 1 sedge and 5 broadleaf weeds. Under AWD, a combination of pre- and post-emergence herbicide spraying resulted in the greatest weed species reduction (14.34/m2). Herbicides applied as pre+ post emergence produced the highest grain production (7.60 t ha-1) under puddling and it was statistically similar to grain yield acquired in application of pre-emergence weed control under AWD. In direct seeded rice highest grain yield (6.02 t ha-1) was produced by application of both pre+ post emergence herbicides under broadcast sowing. The potential yield loss was higher in drill sowing when no herbicide was used or only post- emergence herbicide was applied. AWD is found most promising technology with respect to production and resource conservation.

Author Biographies

  • Mr Aamir , University of the Punjab, Lahore

    Aamir Shehzad was master student from Department of Agronomy, University of the Punjab, Lahore

  • Dr Sajid Ali, University of the Punjab, Lahore

    Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy

  • Dr M. Bilal Chattha, University of the Punjab, Lahore

    Professor & Chairman, Department of Agronomy

  • Dr Ammara Fatima, Lahore college for women University

    Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Science,

  • Mr Ahmad Raza, University of the Punjab, Lahore

    M.Sc student, Department of Agronomy

  • Mr. Nauman Shafqat, University of the Punjab, Lahore

    Ms student, Department of Agronomy

  • Miss Asma Ayub, Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey

    Student, Department of Agronomy, Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey

References

REFERENCES

1. Fahad, S., et al., Major constraints for global rice production, in Advances in rice research for abiotic stress tolerance. 2019, Elsevier. p. 1-22.

2. Hanafiah, M.M., et al., Assessing water scarcity in Malaysia: a case study of rice production. Desalination and water Treatment, 2019. 149: p. 274-287.

3. Fukagawa, N.K. and L.H. Ziska, Rice: Importance for global nutrition. Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology, 2019. 65(Supplement): p. S2-S3.

4. Verma, D.K. and P.P. Srivastav, Bioactive compounds of rice (Oryza sativa L.): Review on paradigm and its potential benefit in human health. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2020. 97: p. 355-365.

5. Bandumula, N., Rice production in Asia: Key to global food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2018. 88: p. 1323-1328.

6. Sidhu, R.K., et al., Automation in drip irrigation for enhancing water use efficiency in cereal systems of South Asia: Status and prospects. Advances in agronomy, 2021. 167: p. 247-300.

7. Ungureanu, N., V. Vlăduț, and G. Voicu, Water scarcity and wastewater reuse in crop irrigation. Sustainability, 2020. 12(21): p. 9055.

8. Salgotra, R.K. and B.S. Chauhan, Ecophysiological responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to drought and high temperature. Agronomy, 2023. 13(7): p. 1877.

9. Alam, M.K., et al., Rice (Oryza sativa L.) establishment techniques and their implications for soil properties, global warming potential mitigation and crop yields. Agronomy, 2020. 10(6): p. 888.

10. Kalita, J., P. Ahmed, and N. Baruah, Puddling and its effect on soil physical properties and growth of rice and post rice crops: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 2020. 9(4): p. 503-510.

11. Kirchhof, G., et al., The effect of soil puddling on the soil physical properties and the growth of rice and post-rice crops. Soil and Tillage Research, 2000. 56(1-2): p. 37-50.

12. Dimple, K. and C. Nagamani, DIRECT SEEDED RICE-A WAY TO CURTAIL METHANE EMISSION. Extended Summaries, 2020: p. 483.

13. Arunbabu, T. and S. Jena, Weeds and progressive weed management techniques in rice (Oryza sativa. L.): A review. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci, 2018. 7(2): p. 108-117.

14. Arefin, M.A., et al., Weed competitiveness of winter rice (Oryza sativa L.) under modified aerobic system. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 2018. 3(1): p. 1-14.

15. Al Mamuna, A., M.F.H. Khanb, and M.M. Haquec, Effect Of Sri And Awd Technology In Comparison To Traditional Methods On Yield Contributing Characters Of Rice (Oryza Sativa). Big Data In Agriculture (BDA), 2023. 6(1): p. 15-21.

16. Chidthaisong, A., et al., Evaluating the effects of alternate wetting and drying (AWD) on methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a paddy field in Thailand. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2018. 64(1): p. 31-38.

17. Xu, L., et al., Comparing the grain yields of direct-seeded and transplanted rice: A meta-analysis. Agronomy, 2019. 9(11): p. 767.

18. Rahman, M.M., Potential benefits of dry direct seeded rice culture: A review. Fundamental and Applied Agriculture, 2019. 4(2): p. 744–758-744–758.

19. Shekhawat, K., S.S. Rathore, and B.S. Chauhan, Weed management in dry direct-seeded rice: A review on challenges and opportunities for sustainable rice production. Agronomy, 2020. 10(9): p. 1264.

20. Rathika, S., T. Ramesh, and P. Shanmugapriya, Weed management in direct seeded rice: A review. IJCS, 2020. 8(4): p. 925-933.

21. Aslam, M., et al., Effect of different stand establishment techniques on rice yields and its attributes. 2008. 18(2-3): p. 80-82.

22. Ehsanullah, I.I., A. Ahmad, and S.A.J.I.J.o.A. Randhawa, Effect of direct seeding and transplanting methods on the yield and quality of fine rice Basmati-370. 2000. 38: p. 547-550.

23. Birhane, A.J.I.j.o.t.e. and e.e. research, Effect of planting methods on yield and yield components of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in Tahtay Koraro Wereda, Northern Ethiopia. 2013. 1(5): p. 1-5.

24. Rahman, A., M.A. Salam, and M.A.J.J.o.t.B.A.U. Kader, Effect of crop establishment methods on the yield of boro rice: Crop establishment method effects yield of rice. 2019. 17(4): p. 521-525.

25. Gathala, M.K., et al., Tillage and crop establishment affects sustainability of South Asian rice–wheat system. 2011. 103(4): p. 961-971.

26. Yaqub, M.J.J.A.R., ECONOMIC EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES ON RICE, ORYZA SA TIVA PRODUCTION. 2007: p. 45m.

27. Kumhar, B.L., et al., Effect of different rice establishment methods on growth, yield and different varieties during kharif season. 2016. 6: p. 127-132.

28. Ghasal, P., et al., Productivity and profitability of rice varieties under different methods of establishment. 2014. 35(3).

29. Singh, R.K., et al., Response of basmati (Oryza sativa L.) rice varieties to system of rice intensification (SRI) and conventional methods of rice cultivation. 2013. 34(1).

30. Dileep, K., S. Pasupalak, and A.J.T.P.I.J. Baliarsingh, Effect of establishment methods and sowing time on growth and yield of rice varieties (Oryza sativa L.). 2018. 7(4): p. 904-907.

31. Hassan, D., R.J.J.o.C. Upasani, and Weed, Effect of crop establishment and weed control methods on productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.). 2015. 11(Special Issue): p. 228-230.

32. Sorour, F., et al., Effect of planting methods and nitrogen fertilizer rates on the productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.). 2016. 42: p. 207-216.

33. Javaid, T., et al., Effect of planting methods on the growth and yield of coarse rice. 2012. 22(2).

34. Salahuddin, K., et al., Response of nitrogen and plant spacing of transplanted aman rice. 2009. 34(2): p. 279-285.

35. Gill, G., et al., Effect of water management on dry seeded and puddled transplanted rice. Part 1: Crop performance. 2011. 120(1): p. 112-122.

36. Saharawat, Y., et al., Evaluation of alternative tillage and crop establishment methods in a rice–wheat rotation in North Western IGP. 2010. 116(3): p. 260-267.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Evaluating Tillage Practices and Herbicide Applications for Improved Rice Yield and Weed Control. (2024). Plant Bulletin, 3(2), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.55627/pbulletin.003.02.01008

Most read articles by the same author(s)