Comparative Effects of Different Methods of Gypsyum Application for Amelioration of Salt-Affected Soil

Authors

  • Khalil Ahmed Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan
  • Amar Iqbal Saqib Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan
  • Ghulam Qadir Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Shakar Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Qaisar Nawaz Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan
  • Ghulam Shabir Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Rizwan Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Faisal Nawaz Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55627/pbulletin.005.01.939

Keywords:

Gypsum, Salinity, Sodicity, Rice, Amelioration

Abstract

Soil degradation due to salinity and sodicity poses a significant challenge to the sustainable agriculture on a global scale. Gypsum has global importance for reclamation of sodium affected soil. Therefore, a study was planned to evaluate positive impacts of different methods of gypsum application on physicochemical properties of salt-affected soil and growth performance of rice crop.  The treatments applied were: T1 = Control (without gypsum), T2 = Gypsum @ 100 % GR before transplanting, T3 = Top dressing of gypsum @ 100 % GR, 15 days after transplanting, T4 = Top dressing of gypsum @ 100 % GR, 30 days after transplanting, T5 = Top dressing of gypsum @ 50 % GR, 15 days after transplanting + Top dressing of gypsum @ 50 % GR, 30 days after transplanting, T6 = Application of gypsum @ 100 % GR, 15 days after transplanting in dissolved form, T7 = Application of gypsum @ 100 % GR, 30 days after transplanting in dissolved form, T8 = Application of gypsum @ 50 % GR, 15 days after transplanting in dissolved form + Application of gypsum @ 50 % GR, 30 days after transplanting in dissolved form. Results of the study revealed that (T1) where gypsum was applied 30 days before rice transplanting was more advantageous method for amelioration of saline-sodic soil, decreasing soil pH from (6.60 to 8.44%), EC (35.09 to 49.31%), SAR (35.95 to 49.55%), HC (7.31 to 13.15%) and BD (2.38 to 2.94%) and also showed the highest value for most of the studied parameters of rice crop.

Author Biographies

  • Amar Iqbal Saqib, Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan

    senior scientist

  • Ghulam Qadir, Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan

    scientific officer

  • Muhammad Shakar, Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan

    senior scientist

  • Muhammad Qaisar Nawaz, Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan

    senior scientist

  • Ghulam Shabir, Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan

    senior scientist

  • Muhammad Rizwan, Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan

    senior scientist

  • Muhammad Faisal Nawaz, Soil Salinity Research Institute Pindi Bhattian, Pakistan

    scientific officer

References

Amezketa, E., Aragués, R., & Gazol, R. (2005). Efficiency of sulfuric acid, mined gypsum, and two gypsum by-products in soil crusting prevention and sodic soil remediation. Agronomy Journal, 97, 983–989.

FAO. (2021). Global Map of Salt Affected Soils Version 1.0. https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/data-hub/soil-maps-and-databases/global-map-of-salt-affected-soils/en/. Accessed December 2021.

Hamoud, Y. A., Saleem, T., Rehman, M. Z., Sarraj, F. A., & Alabdallah, N. M. (2024). Synergistic effect of biochar with gypsum, lime, and farm manure on the growth and tolerance in rice plants under different salt-affected soils. Chemosphere, 360, 142357.

Koralegedara, N. H., Pinto, P. X., Dionysiou, D. D., & Al-Abed, S. R. (2019). Recent advances in flue gas desulfurization gypsum processes and applications - a review. Journal of Environmental Management, 251, 109572.

Liao, R., Yu, H., Lin, H., & Yang, P. (2019). A quantitative study on three-dimensional pore parameters and physical properties of sodic soils restored by FGD gypsum and leaching water. Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 109303.

Patro, H., & Ray, M. (2016). Effect of rate and time of gypsum application on yield, economics and nutrient uptake in groundnut. New Agriculturist, 27(2), 1–6.

Rashmi, I., Meena, B. P., Rajendiran, S., Jayaraman, S., Joshy, C. G., Ali, S., Mina, B. L., Kumar, K., Kumar, A., Kumawat, A., & Kala, S. (2024). Can gypsum and organic amendments achieve sustainability, productivity and maintain soil health under soybean-mustard cropping in sodic soils of western India. Soil and Tillage Research, 240, 106075.

Steel, R. G. D., Torrie, J. H., & Dickey, D. A. (1997). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Sundha, P., Basak, N., Rai, A. K., Yadav, R. K., Sharma, P. C., & Sharma, D. K. (2020). Can conjunctive use of gypsum, city waste composts and marginal quality water rehabilitate saline-sodic soils? Soil & Tillage Research, 200, 104608.

Tirado-Corbal, R., Slater, B. K., Dick, W. A., Bigham, J., & Muñoz-Muñoz, M. (2019). Gypsum amendment effects on micromorphology and aggregation in no-till Mollisols and Alfisols from western Ohio, USA. Geoderma Regional, 16, e00217.

US Salinity Laboratory Staff. (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Handbook 60. Washington, DC, USA.

Wang, S. J., Chen, Q., Li, Y., Zhuo, Y. Q., & Xu, L. Z. (2017). Research on saline-alkali soil amelioration with FGD gypsum. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 121, 82–92.

Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Liang, F., Jing, X., & Feng, W. (2021). Application of flue gas desulfurization gypsum improves multiple functions of saline-sodic soils across China. Chemosphere, 277, 130345.

Xu, X., Guo, L., Wang, S., Wang, X., Ren, M., Zhao, P., Huang, Z., Jia, H., Wang, J., & Lin, A. (2023a). Effective strategies for reclamation of saline-alkali soil and response mechanisms of the soil-plant system. Science of The Total Environment, 905, 167179.

Xu, X., Wang, J., Tang, Y., Cui, X., Hou, D., Jia, H., Wang, S., Guo, L., Wang, J., & Lin, A. (2023b). Mitigating soil salinity stress with titanium gypsum and biochar composite materials: Improvement effects and mechanism. Chemosphere, 321, 138127.

Yong-gan, Z., Wang, S., Liu, J., Zhuo, Y., Li, Y., & Zhang, W. (2021). Fertility and biochemical activity in sodic soils 17 years after reclamation with flue gas desulfurization gypsum. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(12), 3312–3322.

Yu, J., Lei, T., Shainberg, I., Mamedov, A. I., & Levy, G. J. (2003). Infiltration and erosion in soils treated with dry PAM and gypsum. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67, 630–636.

Zhang, W., Zhang, W., Wang, S., Liu, J., Li, Y., Zhuo, Y., Xu, L., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Band application of flue gas desulfurization gypsum improves sodic soil amelioration. Journal of Environmental Management, 298, 113535.

Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Li, Y., Liu, J., Zhuo, Y., Chen, H., Wang, J., Xu, L., & Sun, Z. (2018). Extensive reclamation of saline-sodic soils with flue gas desulfurization gypsum on the Songnen Plain, Northeast China. Geoderma, 321, 52–60.

Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Li, Y., Zhuo, Y., & Liu, J. (2019a). Sustainable effects of gypsum from desulfurization of flue gas on the reclamation of sodic soil after 17 years. European Journal of Soil Science, 70, 1082–1097.

Zhao, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, S., Liub, J., Lia, Y., & Zhuo, Y. (2020). Effects of soil moisture on the reclamation of sodic soil by flue gas desulfurization gypsum. Geoderma, 375, 114485.

Zhao, Y., Wang, S. W., Li, Y., Zhuo, Y., & Liu, J. (2019b). Effects of straw layer and flue gas desulfurization gypsum treatments on soil salinity and sodicity in relation to sunflower yield. Geoderma, 352, 13–21.

Ziskin, R., Dag, A., Yermiyahu, U., & Levy, G. J. (2024). Different amendments for combating soil sodicity in an olive orchard. Agricultural Water Management, 299, 108837.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Comparative Effects of Different Methods of Gypsyum Application for Amelioration of Salt-Affected Soil. (2026). Plant Bulletin, 5(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.55627/pbulletin.005.01.939

Most read articles by the same author(s)