Comparative assessment of avian diversity in Gilgit city using acoustic monitoring (BirdNET) and conventional point count surveys

Authors

  • Mufeed Hussain Department of Animal Sciences, Karakorum International University, Gilgit-15100, Pakistan
  • Saeed Abbas Centre for Biodiversity Conservation and Natural Resources Management, Karakoram International University, Gilgit-15100, Pakistan
  • Nasir Mehdi Department of Animal Sciences, Karakorum International University, Gilgit-15100, Pakistan
  • Atif Hussain Department of Animal Sciences, Karakorum International University, Gilgit-15100, Pakistan
  • Rahila Tabassum Department of Zoology, University of Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55627/zoobotanica.003.03.1697

Keywords:

Urbanization, bird diversity, Gilgit, community structure

Abstract

The process of urbanization tends to streamline bird communities, favouring generalist species. The present acoustic survey is the first of its kind in Gilgit City (Pakistan), aiming to describe the urban bird community using BirdNET (a deep-learning sound identification tool) alongside the parallel point count method. We deployed a portable recorder at 32 selected points across urban, suburban, peri-urban, and riverine environments over ten months (winter, spring, and summer). We processed the recordings using BirdNET, while point-count surveys were subjectively verified. BirdNET identified 47 species, while point counts recorded 45. Both approaches revealed a rich but biased assemblage: a few ubiquitous generalists dominated (e.g., House Sparrow, Streaked Laughing Thrush, Rose-ringed Parakeet), whereas many species were detected only once. Species diversity was moderate overall but declined from peri-urban areas (highest richness: ~31 species) to the urban core (highest richness: ~19 species). Richness peaked seasonally, with winter migrants (e.g., White Wagtail) increasing diversity, and post-breeding flocks causing surges in late summer. Our results corroborate existing evidence that BirdNET-based acoustic monitoring can effectively complement traditional field surveys, while demonstrating its applicability in the high-altitude urban and riverine landscapes of Gilgit City, particularly for detecting nocturnal or cryptic species (e.g., owls, night jars, etc.). These findings align with global evidence of urban avifaunal homogenization and highlight the role of peri-urban green spaces as key biodiversity reservoirs. The current effort is the preliminary comparative quantitative analysis of urban avifauna of Gilgit city and sets crucial data to be used in urban conservation planning.

References

Aronson, M. F. J., La Sorte, F. A., Nilon, C. H., Katti, M., Goddard, M. A., Lepczyk, C. A., … Clarkson, B. (2014). A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1780), 20133330.

Blumstein, D. T., Mennill, D. J., Clemins, P., Girod, L., Yao, K., Patricelli, G. L., … Cortopassi, K. A. (2011). Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospects. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3), 758–767.

Depraetere, M., Pavoine, S., Jiguet, F., Gasc, A., Duvail, S., & Sueur, J. (2012). Monitoring animal diversity using acoustic indices: Implementation in a temperate woodland. Ecological Informatics, 13(1), 46–54.

Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3(4), 390–394.

Gill, F. B., Donsker, D., & Rasmussen, P. (Eds.). (2023). IOC World Bird List (Version 13.2).

Kahl, S., Wood, C. M., Eibl, M., & Klinck, H. (2021). BirdNET: A deep learning solution for avian diversity monitoring. Ecological Informatics, 61, 101236.

McKinney, M. L. (2006). Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation, 127(3), 247–260.

McKinney, M. L. (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems, 11(2), 161–176.

Mellinger, D. K., & Clark, C. W. (2000). Recognizing transient low-frequency whale sounds by spectrogram correlation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(6), 3518–3529.

Sugai, L. S. M., Silva, T. S. F., Ribeiro Jr, J. W., & Llusia, D. (2019). Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. Bio Science, 69(1), 15–25.

Towsey, M., Wimmer, J., Williamson, I., & Roe, P. (2014). The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment. Ecological Informatics, 21, 110–119.

Umar, M., Hussain, M., Murtaza, G., Shaheen, F. A., & Zafar, F. (2018). Ecological concerns of migratory birds in Pakistan: a review. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 50(1), 69–76.

Van Doren, B. M., Lostanlen, V., Cramer, A., Salamon, J., Dokter, A. M., Kelling, S., & Farnsworth, A. (2023). Automated acoustic monitoring captures timing and intensity of bird migration. Journal of Animal Ecology, 60(3), 433–444.

Wood, C. M., Kahl, S., Rahaman, A., & Klinck, H. (2022). The machine learning-powered BirdNET App reduces barriers to global bird research by enabling citizen science participation. PLoS Biology, 20(6), e3001670.

Yingying, L., Lixin, G., Hao, Z., Jiang, F., Yongjun, D., Lei, W., & Tinglei, J. (2024). Application of passive acoustic monitoring in Chiropteran research. Biodiversity Science, 32(10), 24233.

Khan, S., Javed, Z. H., Wahid, A., Ranjha, A. N., & Hasan, M. U. (2020). Climate of the Gilgit-Baltistan Province, Pakistan: Climate of the Gilgit-Baltistan Province, Pakistan. International Journal of Economic and Environmental Geology, 11(3), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.46660/ijeeg.v11i3.269.

Maithripala, A., Arachchi, S. M., Karunanayaka, K., Perera, R., & Pallewatta, P. (2024). A Review of Automated Bird sound recognition and analysis in the New AI Era. Paper presented at the 2024 8th SLAAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SLAAI-ICAI).

Pérez‐Granados, C. J. I. (2023). BirdNET: applications, performance, pitfalls and future opportunities. 165(3), 1068-1075.

Sun, Y., Xiang, D., Wang, J., Jiang, K., Zhu, H., Huang, S., Zhang, F., Li, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025). Comparative analysis of modeling methods and prediction accuracy for Japanese sardine habitat under three climate scenarios with differing greenhouse emission pathways. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 215, 117867.

Symes, L. B., Kittelberger, K. D., Stone, S. M., Holmes, R. T., Jones, J. S., Castaneda Ruvalcaba, I. P., . . . Evolution. (2022). Analytical approaches for evaluating passive acoustic monitoring data: A case study of avian vocalizations. Ecology and Evolution.12(4): e8797. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8797.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Comparative assessment of avian diversity in Gilgit city using acoustic monitoring (BirdNET) and conventional point count surveys. (2025). Zoo Botanica, 3(3), 639-647. https://doi.org/10.55627/zoobotanica.003.03.1697

Similar Articles

11-20 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.